Getting rid of these two superstars could be Manchester United’s best option

The last few weeks have served as somewhat of a reality check for Manchester United after their magnificent run of form was not only halted; but has been followed by a drastic change in fortunes.

Their latest defeat to West Bromwich Albion was not only their third successive loss, but also saw the Red Devils make it three games in a row without even finding the back of the net.

Just a month ago things were looking rosy at Old Trafford, and they had their sights set on second place after impressive victories over Tottenham and Liverpool before an emphatic display against rivals Manchester City saw them run out 4-2 winners.

It seemed Louis van Gaal had finally found a system and starting 11 that would bring about a solid end to the season with the goals starting to fly in.

But remarkably Chris Smalling’s header on April 12 was the last time United got on the score sheet, and their recent run must come as a real worry to the manger.

Thankfully Van Gaal’s side still hold a four-point advantage over Liverpool with three games remaining; which should be enough to secure a return to the Champions League which was their primary focus at the beginning of the season.

But having failed to register a point or even a goal in defeats to Chelsea, Everton and West Brom, it shows there is plenty of work to be done and those getting carried away with talk of a title challenge may have to rethink such claims.

[ad_pod id=’ffc-video-small’ align=’left’]

So where’s it gone wrong for United? And how can the Dutchman solve United’s attacking problems?

Perhaps the biggest issue for the Reds has been the injury problems. Michael Carrick’s absence from the side since leaving the field in the closing stages of the Manchester derby has had a huge effect on the team both in defensively and in attack, and they haven’t looked the same since.

The holding midfielder had been a key part of the team while they went on that winning run, kick starting attacks and shielding the defence ensuring they looked more solid. It’s no coincidence that since losing him, that they have lost three league games in a row for the first time since December 2001, and failed to score in three successive games since 2007.

United have shown they have nobody who can perform anywhere near as effectively as Carrick, and this has also had an effect on the role Wayne Rooney has been playing in recent weeks.

The England striker had been performing brilliantly as the main man in attack, coinciding with the good run of results. But ever since Carrick’s injury he has been forced to drop back, often playing in midfield and as a result United have lost his effectiveness when going forward.

With Rooney playing a deeper role, this had led to both Radamel Falcao and Robin van Persie getting starts in the team, but once again they have failed to impress.

Falcao continues to struggle and looks like a man hugely short on confidence, while Van Persie’s return from injury at the weekend probably couldn’t have gone any worse. The Dutchman looked rusty and missed a few good chances before seeing his spot kick saved to sum up a terrible afternoon.

Although they have both proven themselves to be two fantastic strikers, to ensure they stop the losing streak Van Gaal needs to revert back to the side that looked so impressive just last month. And that means pushing Rooney upfront on his own and leaving out the other two.

FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast. FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast.


By subscribing, you agree to receive newsletter and marketing emails, and accept Valnet’s Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. You can unsubscribe anytime.

Rooney has shown he is most effective playing up top, and going forward into next season this is how he should be deployed. The manager has a decision to make about Falcao, one that should result in him playing his football elsewhere next season after failing to deliver on numerous occasions.

And as for Van Persie, he’s sure to come good again and so selling him wouldn’t be the best of decisions particularly given his experience. But maybe his days as a first choice striker are coming to an end, and although it takes a brave man to keep him on the bench, this could be the best option for United especially in the big games.

There’s no doubting they need further investment in attacking areas, and the addition of Memphis Deepay would prove most welcome. But it’s cover for Carrick that they also need, to ensure Rooney’s attacking threat is not wasted and he can remain upfront.

It’s going to be another interesting summer at Old Trafford, but despite talk of a new striker it wouldn’t be the worst decision to hold back from signing one. With Rooney leading the line, and Van Persie in reserve there isn’t room for another big name in the side, and with Javier Hernandez due to return from Real Madrid at the end of the season, you could argue they already have enough options.

[ad_pod id=’ricco’ align=’center’]

Have Arsenal failed to take advantage of 15 years of riches?

Arsene Wenger has prided himself on the 15 consecutive years that Arsenal have qualified for Europe’s most prestigious cup competition, the Champions League. Further than priding himself, the Gunners boss has used the impressive feat as a justification for the club’s inability to keep up in the title race over the past five years; although failing to get past the round of 16 for three campaigns in a row is hardly anything to write home about.

In addition to the glory and pride that comes with playing in the Champions League, comes huge financial rewards in Television revenues, which is calculated by a rather complex formula to divide UEFA’s overall earnings accordingly between each club based upon domestic standing as well as which round they reach in the European competition. Additionally, there are win and draw bonuses, and fixed fiscal prizes for each stage.

For example, in the 2011/2012 season, according to The Guardian, UEFA cashed in  €1.1billion in selling TV rights and sponsorship deals. 79% is then divided between all of the participating clubs, and the rest is kept by UEFA to cover the tournament’s running costs. The remaining €865 million (79%) split between the clubs is divided into two pools, firstly the fixed rewards, such as €3.9million for reaching the Group Stages, plus €550K per win, and secondly for their final standings domestically and in the European competition.

Perhaps the £25million Arsenal earned from the Champions League in the 2010/2011 season is not as much as one would have first thought, and although it creates a big difference between the clubs at the bottom of the table in the Premier League, it is still a fraction of the club’s overall revenue; 11% in fact for the year in question.

But along with the financial rewards of the Champions League itself, comes a number of commercial opportunities for exposure and sale of merchandise. Essentially, being in the competition gets your club’s name heard around the world, as it’s broadcasted in 220 different countries, and therefore boosts your profile globally, allowing for independent sponsorship deals to be made.

So how have Tottenham Hotspur, a club with a single year of Champions League experience under its belt, come to eclipse their local rivals in terms of league standing as well as quality in their roster, despite the obvious financial rewards and commercial exposure Arsenal have benefited from for 15 years straight?

I am not arguing it is the end for Arsenal, or that they will now and forever always be a lesser team than Spurs, but excluding Theo Walcott, Santi Cazorla and Jack Wilshere, would any of the Gunners starting XI be guaranteed a hypothetical place in the Tottenham first team? Furthermore, whilst Arsene Wenger possesses a squad full of injury-prone-has-beens and lacklustre flops, Andre Villas-Boas is spoilt for choice in defence and midfield, with a balance of young and old, and a natural pecking order established at White Hart Lane.

The Arsenal wage structure has come under scrutiny this season and it’s easy to see why. According to The Independent, the club’s total wage bill is verging on the £150million mark, whilst Tottenham’s stands at just £90million. The difference is more understandable when taking into consideration the contracts of players like Marouane Chamakh and Sebastien Squillaci, who are both on £50k per week deals for literally making up the numbers at the Emirates and doing nothing more.

Squillaci has made just a single league appearance over the past two seasons, whilst Chamakh has now been farmed out, along with Johan Djourou, Denilson, Andre Santos, Park Chu-Young and Nicklas Bendtner, but all are on deals that vastly surpass their roles at the club considering none have been first team regulars for quite some time. Of course, Champions League clubs are held to ransom by agents demanding Champions League wages for their players, but considering much of the Gunners roster are now not Champions League quality, the club’s wage structure, which has been described as “socialist” by a number of the newspapers, clearly isn’t providing value for money.

Furthermore, some of the blame has to be attached to Arsene Wenger. His lack of ambition in the transfer market has left the squad deteriorated in depth, and similarly the first team have depreciated in value and quality over the past five years. Without Robin Van Persie carrying out a talismanic role up front this season, the rest of the team has been shown up for its widespread lack of talent compared to the likes of Chelsea, Manchester City, Manchester United and Tottenham.

The club’s record transfer fee is currently the £16million spent on Santi Cazorla in the summer, whereas Chelsea’s is £50million, City’s is £37million, Liverpool’s is £35million and United’s is £31million. Out of the five clubs, who have all been Champions League regulars at one time or another, Arsenal’s is by far the least, and is even £2million less than Tottenham’s record fee of £18million for Luka Modric. It’s clear that whilst other clubs have taken advantage of the additional revenues and commercial exposure provided by the Champions League, the Gunners quite frankly have not.

Arsene Wenger has used the building of the club’s new stadium as a justification for his reluctance to spend big in the past. But now that all debts are paid, he should have a free reign in the next transfer window, and has already discussed an apparent £80million transfer and wage kitty that will be at his disposal in the summer. However, it could easily be a case of too little too late if the Gunners miss out on a Champions League spot to their local rivals, which will seriously hurt the Arsenal supporters.

FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast. FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast.


By subscribing, you agree to receive newsletter and marketing emails, and accept Valnet’s Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. You can unsubscribe anytime.

Whereas in the past, Wenger had the opportunity to pay large fees for players desperate to play European football, which he turned down, he may find recruitment for the 2013/2014 season much harder should the North Londoners fail to qualify. Similarly, he will now have a group of players on Champions League wages, who aren’t Champions League quality, without the additional revenues of the tournament to cover their salaries.

Of course, being in the Champions League is no guarantee of success. Liverpool won the competition in 2005, and have since slid down the Premier League table and now find themselves squandering in the middle order of the English top flight. But the fact that Tottenham’s rise has collided with Arsenal’s decline highlights just how the inefficiently the club is being run, with the majority of profits being sucked up by the wage bill alone, leaving little left for transfer funds. Furthermore, and most importantly, it symbolises how Wenger has failed to take advantage of his 15 years of success, and has now allowed local and league rivals Tottenham to better him.

[post_link url=”https://www.footballfancast.com/premiership/the-10-transfers-tottenham-arsenal-should-snap-up-to-challenge,https://www.footballfancast.com/premiership/tottenham/the-10-transfer-priorities-for-tottenham-this-summer,https://www.footballfancast.com/premiership/arsenal/a-mistake-for-arsenal-to-cash-in-on-him-this-summer,https://www.footballfancast.com/premiership/arsenal/the-top-10-transfer-priorities-for-arsenal-this-summer,https://www.footballfancast.com/football-blogs/bale-suarez-robin-van-persie-deserves-it-more-than-anyone” target=”_blank” type=”grid”]

Cahill’s performance against Southampton suggests his Chelsea career isn’t over

Gary Cahill’s first season as Chelsea captain – having replaced John Terry in the summer – hasn’t quite gone as planned.

The Blues have slumped from runaway champions to fifth – facing the very real prospect of Europa League football next season – and on a personal level, the former Bolton defender hasn’t featured as much as he would have liked.

Nevertheless, the defender – valued at £13.5m by Transfermarkt – got the nod from Antonio Conte on Saturday as Chelsea played out a dress rehearsal for Sunday’s FA Cup semi-final against Southampton.

It looked as if Cahill’s return would turn into a nightmare as the Saints raced into a 2-0 lead and with just 20 minutes remaining, Chelsea were staring down the barrel.

Three goals in eight minutes turned the game on its head and Cahill’s numbers from the game are quite solid and he made a late claim to be in the starting 11 for the cup semi at Wembley.

Seven headers won and four clearances are the standouts as Cahill helped the Blues ride out a late onslaught but his other numbers also showed evidence of a man who wasn’t rusty and is ready to take his chance if he gets the nod at Wembley.

FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast. FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast.


By subscribing, you agree to receive newsletter and marketing emails, and accept Valnet’s Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. You can unsubscribe anytime.

[ad_pod ]

Is this world class star still the ‘one who got away’ for Arsenal?

“If I had played in England I would have destroyed it, like I have everywhere else.”

Zlatan Ibrahimovic never has been one to mince his words, even if this one particular quote has in-fact been abruptly denied by the player since it first emerged. He goes down as one of the most enigmatic, skilful and entertaining players of his era, but as he is yet to ply his trade in the Premier League, the 33-year-old striker seemingly hasn’t ticked off everything European football has to offer.

But it’s not like that will come as a great regret to the player himself. Zlatan – in his words – has ‘destroyed it’ in the Swedish Allsvenskan, the Dutch Eredivisie, Italy’s Serie A, the illustrious La Liga in Spain, as well as in the French Ligue 1 with PSG. Ibrahimovic therefore has a footballing CV to be proud of and the game is certainly better off because of his involvement.

However, after reportedly claiming that ‘Zlatan doesn’t do trials’ after his proposed move to Arsenal broke down early on in his career, English football ultimately seems to have missed out on playing host to the ever controversial striker.

In light of such a decision, were the Gunners always going to be just fine without the Swedish star on board, or does Zlatan Ibrahimovic remain ‘the one who got away’ for Arsene Wenger and Arsenal?

[ad_pod id=’ffc-video-small’ align=’left’]

A remark like that could only really be made by two types of person: The first would be someone with grand ideas but also a strong degree of delusion, but the second would be a person who would not only fail to regret turning down a move to the Gunners in such dramatic style, but also someone who had it in them to go on to achieve even higher accolades in the world of modern football.

Zlatan definitely falls into the second category – the majority of goals that he has scored throughout his career would not have been put away by anyone else. Whether it be through the deadly power of his net-breaking shots, the supreme confidence that somehow comes every time he steps out on the pitch – or maybe just his reported black-belt in Taekwondo – the former Ajax, Juventus and Barca striker is simply unplayable on his day. Just ask any member of the English national side that saw their team pummelled 4-2 in what many have labelled ‘the Zlatan Ibrahimovic Show’ in late 2012.

Arsenal would have therefore loved to have seen Zlatan do his thing at Highbury or the Emirates – there simply isn’t any other way of putting it. Under the guidance of the likes of Thierry Henry and Dennis Bergkamp, the Swedish international would have likely become even more of a talent than he currently is today – especially with someone as experienced in player development as Arsene Wenger supervising his progress.

If things had gone well, Ibrahimovic could have played on in the absence of Arsenal’s now retired strikers, and subsequently won more trophies for the Gunners as a result.

Having said that though, the player himself would have likely never properly fitted in at a club such as Arsenal. The fact that Zlatan didn’t even think Arsene Wenger was worthy of an audition really tells you all you need to know. Yes – he would have wowed fans of the Premier League with his incredible talents and ability with the ball, but it simply remains too hard to imagine the enigmatic front-man ever wanting to play second fiddle to anyone else – no matter how talented his senior teammates may have been.

FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast. FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast.


By subscribing, you agree to receive newsletter and marketing emails, and accept Valnet’s Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. You can unsubscribe anytime.

For that reason alone, the player himself can’t really go down as ‘one who got away’ for Arsenal. His apparent outlook at the time just wouldn’t have allowed for the partnership to work out for all parties involved. Zlatan seemingly had to make his own way in the footballing world – and as his career really is one to behold in the modern era – that is exactly what he’s done.

Perhaps though, in the ever changing realms of the current game, maybe – just maybe – one last move to the Premier League awaits Zlatan Ibrahimovic in the final curtain call of his illustrious footballing life.

[ad_pod id=’ricco’ align=’center’]

Arsenal defence face summer exit

Arsene Wenger is targeting centre-backs in a bid to improve his team’s defence in the summer transfer window.

After a string of bad performances in the Premier League the Arsenal boss has been left frustrated by defenders Per Mertsacker and Thomas Vermaelen, and he is eyeing up replacements.

Current captain Vermaelen has had a huge dip in form this season and there is reports that the captaincy is to blame but he has also suffered an ankle injury. Mertesacker and Sagna could also be leaving the Emirates come May.

The Arsenal scouts having been trying to find central defence targets and it has been indicated that they are interested in Swansea captain Ashley Williams as well as Fernando Amorebieta, Nicolas N’Koulou and Raul Abiol, according to The Daily Mail.

Arsene Wenger has never spoken publicly of individual failings in the team but behind closed doors he is frustrated that the defence aren’t playing as well as they should be. He considered a change in formation before Christmas, which would have meant placing an extra defender into the backline, but decided to stick with the current formation.

He has spotted a weakness in the backline and he wants to improve that, but the French boss is also looking for a new goalkeeper, right-back, defensive midfielder and a forward which he hopes will enable Arsenal to compete for silverware next season.

FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast. FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast.


By subscribing, you agree to receive newsletter and marketing emails, and accept Valnet’s Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. You can unsubscribe anytime.

Wenger is considering removing the captaincy from Vermaelen and handing it over to 21-year-old Jack Wilshere next season bringing forward the plan to do from 2015.

[cat_link cat=”arsenal” type=”grid”]

Sunderland fans attack Camp for awful performances

Sunderland fans are absolutely furious with Lee Camp after the goalkeeper’s horrendous display made life easy for Sheffield Wednesday on Monday.

There looked to be life in Sunderland’s season on Friday night as the Black Cats romped to a 4-1 win against playoff chasing Derby, but fans’ hopes were soon quashed by some horrific defending in Monday’s defeat to Sheffield Wednesday.

The Owls left the Stadium of Light with a 3-1 win, courtesy of goals from Lucas Joao, Tom Lees and Atdhe Nuhiu, but if truth be told they didn’t have to work all that hard.

Sunderland were actually the better team for large parts of the match, but some shambolic defending combined with Camp’s ability to make any cross look dangerous shattered their survival hopes.

The 33 year-old keeper, who started his career with Derby, joined from Cardiff in January, but has far from impressed fans.

FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast. FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast.


By subscribing, you agree to receive newsletter and marketing emails, and accept Valnet’s Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. You can unsubscribe anytime.

Despite a few great saves since the move, Camp’s struggles with balls into the box have frustrated fans, and been made even worse by the shaky defending in front of him.

Fans have been mercilessly attacking Camp for his performance, and some of the best Twitter reactions can be found below…

Is victory written in the stars at Liverpool?

After Saturday’s hard-fought 2-1 FA Cup fifth round win over Crystal Palace, Brendan Rodgers’ Liverpool have given themselves every chance of lifting the famous old trophy come the end of the season.

But do Liverpool have to win the FA Cup to save their topsy-turvy season? Obviously, with the imminent departure of captain and club legend Steven Gerrard, it would be the perfect send-off for a player who has done so much for the Merseyside club during his illustrious 16-year career at Anfield.

With the final taking place on Gerrard’s birthday, Rodgers told the Guardian recently that there would be no better goodbye present:

“I think the FA Cup final is on his birthday, so there would be no better way, for him. It would be a wonderful send-off for him,” said Rodgers. “There are a lot of games to play in between. If we could do it, it will be really special.”

But to suggest Liverpool must win the FA Cup is probably a little bit over the top. Of course they would love to, and not being able to capitalise of last season’s second place Premier League finish has been a massive disappointment for everyone involved with the club. Nonetheless, the way the FA Cup has panned out this season, the Reds have a real chance of winning the trophy for the first time since 2006.

With giants Manchester United and Arsenal going head-to-head in the quarter-finals, Liverpool’s home tie with Blackburn Rovers becomes even more important. No disrespect to Rovers, who had an excellent 4-1 win over Stoke City in round four, the Reds really should be looking to put Gary Bowyer’s team to the sword and confirm a Wembley semi-final spot. The draw has also set up a Midlands derby as Aston Villa host West Bromwich Albion, and League One side Bradford entertain Championship side Reading.

[ad_pod id=’football-friends’ align=’center’]

It’s been far from the usual FA Cup campaigns we’ve been so used to seeing in recent years. With giant-killings galore – including Bradford City’s memorable 4-2 win at Chelsea and Middlesbrough’s superb 2-0 victory over Manchester City – this FA Cup campaign will certainly live long in the memory.

With the cup aside, Liverpool still have a good chance of gaining one of the much-coveted top four spots. Securing Champions League football for next season must still be Brendan Rodgers’ number one priority, but that shouldn’t deter too much attention from FA Cup success. The Reds currently sit in seventh place, four points off of Southampton who currently occupy the last Champions League position.

FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast. FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast.


By subscribing, you agree to receive newsletter and marketing emails, and accept Valnet’s Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. You can unsubscribe anytime.

With a number of clubs all vying for what looks like just two remaining top four spots, Liverpool have certainly got their work cut out to overhaul all those teams. Which makes the FA Cup an excellent opportunity to somewhat save their season from disaster.

All the omens in the world are pointing to Liverpool’s name being etched into this year’s FA Cup. There are still a few big clubs who will have their say, but wouldn’t it just be so fitting to see Steven Gerrard lifting a trophy in a Liverpool shirt, one final time?

[ad_pod id=’ffc-video’ align=’center’]

Everton losses paying off on the pitch

’s widening losses are a result of the club’s emphasis on improving its league position, according to chief executive Robert Elstone.

The Toffees reported a net loss of £9.1m in the 2011-12 season, compared with a loss of £5.4m a year earlier, with turnover down slightly at £80.5m.

Wages were the biggest expenditure for the club last season, at 75% of turnover. It spent £63.4m on players’ salaries, up from £58m a year earlier.

But those extra expenses appear to be paying off, with strong season tickets sales and fine results on the pitch so far this season, and the Merseysiders said it expected better financial results for 2012-13.

“The club has demonstrated its commitment to first-team success with increased expenditure on player wages,” Elstone told BBC News.

“We continue to try to enhance our competitive position and, at the same time, manage cost base and debt levels effectively.”

Meanwhile, club owner Bill Kenwright insists he is also looking for fresh investment to boost spending power in the transfer market.

“My desire to find a person, or institution, with the finance to move us forward has not diminished,” he said.

“Despite the challenges presented by the global economic downturn, we remain positive and determined.”

FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast. FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast.


By subscribing, you agree to receive newsletter and marketing emails, and accept Valnet’s Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. You can unsubscribe anytime.

Everton are currently in the hunt for a top-four spot in the Premier League and with it a chance to play in the lucrative Champions League next season.

After their 2-1 victory over Newcastle last night, the Toffees sit in fifth position, two points behind Chelsea in fourth.

[cat_link cat=”everton” type=”grid”]

Wharton century drives Yorkshire past Kent and into home semi-final

Jaydn Denly, Ekansh Singh star for Kent but can’t stem the tide

ECB Reporters Network supported by Rothesay26-Aug-2025Yorkshire 301 for 9 (Wharton 118, Imam-ul-Haq 70, Ekansh 3-42) beat Kent 225 (Jaydn Denly 77, Ekansh 71, Bess 4-43) by 76 runsYorkshire secured a home semi-final in the Metro Bank Cup after coasting to a 76-run victory over the Kent Spitfires at Canterbury.James Wharton hit a century as Yorkshire posted 301 for 9 and Dom Bess then took four for 43 as the Spitfires were dismissed for 225.Wharton hit 118 from 106 balls, while Imam-ul-Haq was the next highest scorer with 70, while Ekansh Singh took three for 42 before making 71 during the Kent reply.Jaydn Denly was the hosts’ top-scorer with 77 but they lost wickets too frequently to sustain a chase and were all out with 5.4 overs remaining.Yorkshire chose to bat and put on 71 for the opening wicket before Corey Flintoff sent Adam Lyth’s off stump flying, bowling him for 28.Mo Rizvi then bowled debutant Will Bennison for a fifth ball duck, but Wharton and Imam-ul-Haq put on 59 for the next wicket, Ekansh breaking the partnership when he had the latter lbw.Finlay Bean made a useful 39 before he was run out by Ollie Curtiss and George Hill made just seven when Klaassen had him caught by Jaydn Denly.Harry Duke hit Ekansh almost vertically and was caught by wicket-keeper Harry Finch for 3 and Ekansh struck again two overs later when he caught and bowled Bess for four.Dan Moriarty went in similar fashion to Klaassen and Wharton finally fell in the final over when Fred Klaassen had him caught behind, leaving Cliff to take the visitors past 300.The chase got off to a rough start when Ben Dawkins went for 1, chipping Ben Cliff to Lyth but Kent responded with a 97-run stand that only ended when Bess had Denly caught by Imam-ul-Haq.Chris Benjamin was then the victim of a brilliant rope-juggle catch by the sub fielder Noah Kelly, after he drove Bess and Joe Denly went for just two, miscuing Dan Moriarty straight to Fin Bean at long off. Curtiss went next ball, lbw for a golden duck on only his second appearance for the Spitfires.Ekansh also fell to Kelly when he skied Hill and Lyth got revenge on Flintoff when he bowled him for 13.Bess came back and bowled Finch for a run-a-ball for 32, then got Klaassen two balls later playing on, leaving Mattie Firbank to seal win when Rizvi pulled him to Lyth, his team mates mobbing him in celebration.

Jaiswal's blistering century caps India's day of dominance

Earlier in the day, India’s bowling attack roared back to bowl out England for 319 despite Ben Duckett’s 153

Sidharth Monga17-Feb-2024″Even when it was 200 for 2, guys were pretty relaxed. You know, in a session, there is four or five that could come your way.”R Ashwin, the man who said those words, might have pulled out of the Test overnight for personal reasons, but the Indian attack was good enough to vindicate him with eight wickets in a session and a half as India roared back from the shock of a sensational Ben Duckett hundred on day two. Kuldeep Yadav softened England up with an excellent spell that virtually ran through the first session, and Mohammed Siraj capitalised on it in the second session as India took the last eight wickets for just 95 runs.With a first-innings lead of 126 secured, India’s batters finally got down to scoring the runs that should be scored off an inexperienced and inaccurate attack. Riding on a sparkling century from Yashasvi Jaiswal, India ended the day with a lead of 322, which is 84 more than what they still had in the bank at the start of the day. That is probably why Ashwin was confident of a comeback on a pitch that was likely to only get worse for batting.Related

  • Crafty Kuldeep undoes Bazball in 12-over spell for the ages

  • Ashwin withdraws from Rajkot Test because of family emergency

  • Duckett defends Root dismissal: Reverse-scoop to slip the same as nicking off

Five of the 12 wickets on the first two days had fallen in the first hour. It was pertinent that India cash in on that movement from the moisture early in the morning. In Ashwin’s absence, they began with Jasprit Bumrah and Kuldeep. Immediately, it was apparent there was a little more available than had been in the second half of day two, which is when Duckett had led England to 207 for 2 in 35 overs.Bazball gives, but Bazball takes as well. Joe Root, more overs under his belt than runs in this series, tried the reverse scoop in Bumrah’s third over of the day, but ended up hitting it to second slip for a sharp catch for Jaiswal. To be fair to Root, until then he had scored 64 with that shot in just 23 balls for one dismissal. What followed is a true test of the dressing room’s disregard for results, the biggest building block of Bazball.Kuldeep Yadav sent back Ben Duckett for 153•Getty Images

In the early exchanges, Duckett had reminded India of the problem they had. Kuldeep had a deep square leg for the sweep, and a deep cover for the reverse sweep, but he swept from in front of the stumps and deliberately in front of square. And when India sent another man back, he picked an easy single.Kuldeep’s response was to go wider and look for more overspin. That kept Duckett quiet, and then drew an edge on the reverse sweep, his first boundary off an edge. Eventually, after reaching 150, he ended up hitting a short, wide ball straight to cover. It just stopped a touch and turned more than expected. Everything was coming together for India: the pitch was misbehaving just that little bit more, a traditionally high-risk shot had gone straight to hand, and Kuldeep was bowling beautifully.Kuldeep was in great rhythm, giving the ball proper rip, creating deception both in the air and off the surface. Before he got Duckett in what might look on the surface a soft manner, he had beaten Jonny Bairstow in the air, and then ripped the ball in to trap him for his eighth duck against India, the most by any batter.Kuldeep bowled through the session bar one over for day-three figures of 12-1-35-2. It might be just two wickets, but it set the foundation for India conceding just 83 in 26 overs in the session. Finally India had some control over the free-scoring England batters.Post lunch, Ben Stokes tried to take a few risks, and for once they didn’t all come off. Ravindra Jadeja, bowling around the wicket to the left-hand batter, an angle that has raised a few eyebrows in the series, got him on the slog sweep thanks to that angle. The ball didn’t turn, and Stokes holed out. Something similar happened with Tom Hartley, who charged him but was beaten by the lack of turn and stumped to give Dhruv Jurel his first Test victim.Joe Root handed a catch to second slip off a reverse scoop•Associated Press

At the other end, Siraj charged in, reversed the ball, and ran through the lower order. Ben Foakes got one that stopped in the surface, and then pinged all the way to mid-on for a catch. Rehan Ahmed got a superb yorker that he even cue-ended, but couldn’t save his off stump. Full, reversing, off-stump-seeking Siraj was too good for James Anderson. For once, India had ended an innings in just 85 false responses, a bit of luck they were due after the hard work in the first four innings of the series.For the fifth time in the series, the young batting group was presented with an opportunity to bat England out of a match. India’s innings began right at the mid-point of the middle day of the middle Test of the series; by the end of the day it seemed the series had turned a corner. Finally it looked like a four-man attack whose one spinner debuted this series. Their best spinner has been Root, who got them their first wicket: Rohit Sharma lbw to a ball too full.Jaiswal and Shubman Gill then began slowly, absorbed the best England had to offer, and got to 75 for 1 in 26 overs. Jaiswal looked at ease, Gill seemed to have started back and across to try to cover the off stump better. In the 27th over, floodgates opened. On 35 off 73 at this moment, Jaiswal flicked a switch, hooked Anderson, then pulled him dismissively in front of square, and then lofted Hartley for two sixes down the ground. Suddenly he was 61 off 81.Then Jaiswal biffed Ahmed down the ground before sweeping Root for his 18th six in just seven Tests. The cherry on the top was his two reverse-swept boundaries in three balls off Ahmed, played the way England have been playing: switch the stance but not the grip. This is just after head coach Rahul Dravid might have sent him a quiet instruction to be ruthless. He brought up his third Test hundred with a cut in front of square off Mark Wood, bowling with a square field for the short ball.Almost a silent partner, Gill reminded everyone he was around when he pulled Mark Wood for a six to bring up his fifty off 98 balls. He scored just 57 in the 155-run stand, which came to a pause with back pain forcing Jaiswal to retire hurt, probably a precaution keeping next week’s Test in Ranchi in mind.

Game
Register
Service
Bonus